JUST IN: Tribunal To Deliver Judgement On PDP Suit Against Tinubu, Shettima On May 26

Tribunal is set to deliver judgement on PDP suit against Tinubu and Shettima on May 26....CONTINUE READING

TheCable reports that the Supreme Court has fixed May 26 to deliver judgment in a suit seeking the disqualification of Bola Tinubu and Kashim Shettima as presidential and vice- presidential candidates of the All Progressives Congress (APC)…..CONTINUE READING

The judgment will be delivered three days before the inauguration of the president-elect and the vice-president-elect.

PAY ATTENTION:   Avoid Eating Rice If You Have Any Of The Following Conditions

The PDP, in the suit filed on July 28, 2022, claimed that Shettima’s nomination as Tinubu’s running mate was in breach of the provisions of sections 29(1), 33, 35, and 84(1)(2) of the electoral act, 2022.

The party argued that Shettima’s nomination to contest the position of vice-president and Borno central senatorial seat — at the same time — contravened the law.

The PDP, which sought an order disqualifying the APC, Tinubu, and Shettima from contesting the presidential election, also sought an order nullifying their candidacies.

PAY ATTENTION:   Seven Signs Of The Malaria Virus That Are Visible In Urine

However, Inyang Ekwo, the trial judge at the court of appeal, dismissed the suit on the grounds that the PDP lacked the locus standi to institute the suit.

Not satisfied, the PDP appealed the judgment.

a three-member panel of the court of appealDelivering judgment in the appeal, led by James Abundaga held that the PDP failed to establish that it had locus standi to institute the case.

PAY ATTENTION:   If you’re constantly feeling tired, you need to stop doing these 10 things in the first hour after waking up

Abundaga described the PDP as a “busybody”, who dabbled into issues that were internal affairs of the APC.

“The appellant, having failed to disclose its locus standi, this appeal fails and it is hereby dismissed,” he said.

The judge also awarded N5 million cost against the appellant’s lawyer, J. O. Olotu…..CONTINUE READING